PerformYard vs Engagedly (2026): Compare Features & Pricing

Both PerformYard and Engagedly target the same general buyer. They are both an HR team at a mid-market company that has outgrown spreadsheet-based reviews and needs a structured performance management system. The overlap on a feature checklist is real. Both cover review cycles, 360-degree feedback, goals, continuous feedback, and engagement surveys. Both have AI tooling. Both price at or near $5/user/month for their performance management tier.

The distinction is architectural. PerformYard was built to make performance reviews actually happen: configurable cycles, automated reminders, a dedicated success manager for every account, and audit-ready documentation. Engagedly was built as a broader talent management suite, with a built-in LMS as its clearest differentiator. If review completion and compliance documentation are the primary problems, these platforms land differently. This software comparison is for HR teams that have both on the shortlist.

PerformYard Overview

PerformYard is a Virginia-based performance management platform serving organizations from 50 to 1,000+ employees. Its design focus is narrow by choice: make review cycles configurable enough that HR can match any methodology, and make completion rates high enough that the investment is justified. Every account gets a dedicated customer success manager, hands-on implementation is included free, and the documentation trail supports audit requirements out of the box.

The platform earned a G2 rating of 4.7/5 from approximately 1,260 reviews as of July 2026, one of the highest sustained scores in the performance management category. Capterra rates it 4.7/5 from 187 reviews, with customer service at 4.7/5. The review base skews toward small and mid-market organizations in information technology, professional services, and regulated industries including financial services, healthcare, and federal contractors.

PerformYard’s 2026 AI layer covers Review Assist (real-time writing coaching during review completion), Review Summary (multi-form review condensed into one actionable summary), AI meeting notes, and Ask PerformYard (conversational AI for policy and process questions). The platform does not include a native LMS or learning management capability.

Key features include:

• Configurable review cycles: annual, quarterly, 30/60/90-day, project-based, and exit reviews running concurrently with separate question sets, rating scales, and reviewer configurations
• 360-degree feedback: HR-configured cycles with peer nomination, automatic routing, and direct connection to review forms
• Goal tracking: connected to review cycles and ratings; functional but lighter than dedicated OKR platforms
• Continuous feedback: year-round feedback separate from formal review cycles, stored for review context
• 1-on-1 meetings: collaborative agendas, task tracking, AI meeting summaries
• AI Review Assist and Review Summary: writing coaching and multi-form condensation across the review workflow
• Engagement surveys (add-on): pulse surveys with AI-driven recommendations; $2 to $4/person/month
• Documentation and audit trail: searchable, exportable history of every review and rating; OFCCP-ready
• Integrations: Workday, BambooHR, ADP Workforce Now, Gusto, Rippling, Paylocity, UKG, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Okta, Google Workspace

For full pricing details and a live demo, visit PerformYard's official website.

Why Teams Choose PerformYard

“What I like most about PerformYard Performance Management is how it makes performance tracking structured, transparent, and continuous, instead of feeling like a once-a-year review. It helps managers and employees align goals clearly, share ongoing feedback, and track progress in real time.” – G2 reviewer

• Dedicated support for every account. A named customer success manager, hands-on implementation, unlimited employee trainings, and phone and video support are included at no extra cost. At $5 to $10/person/month, this is genuinely unusual. Most platforms in this price range route support through ticketed help desks.
• Review cycle flexibility that matches any HR methodology. Multiple concurrent review types with fully configurable question sets, rating scales, and visibility rules. Project-based reviews, exit reviews, and 30/60/90-day check-ins can all run simultaneously with separate configurations.
• Documentation that survives a compliance audit. Every review, rating, and approval is logged, searchable, and exportable. For financial services firms, healthcare organizations, and federal contractors with OFCCP requirements, this is a specific fit that most generalist platforms do not address as directly.
• High completion rates. Automated reminders, manager-facing nudges, and a simple interface drive the completion rates that justify the investment. PerformYard’s own 2026 research shows consistent users achieve 27% higher goal completion rates by Year 4 compared to Year 1.

Where PerformYard Falls Short

“One potential drawback of PerformYard Performance Management is that, like many structured performance systems, it can feel time-consuming if it isn’t integrated smoothly into daily workflows. Some users may also find there’s a learning curve before they can fully adopt the platform.” – G2reviewer 

• No date-triggered automation. Review cycles cannot launch automatically based on hire date or tenure. Organizations with rolling hire dates and anniversary-based reviews must manually initiate cycles or build workarounds. This is the most consistently reported limitation across PerformYard’s review base.
• No native LMS. PerformYard has no learning management capability. Training, course creation, skill tracking, and learning paths require a separate tool. For organizations that want performance and development in one system, this is a structural gap Engagedly fills directly.
• Reporting requires effort. Aggregate analytics, cross-cycle trend reports, and custom data exports are documented friction points. The AI summaries help at the individual review level but do not resolve the analytics gap at the program level.
• Contract terms deserve scrutiny. Capterra reviewers report multi-year contract requirements in some cases. Confirm renewal terms and exit conditions before signing.

Engagedly Overview

Where PerformYard goes deep on review cycles, Engagedly goes wide across talent management. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Engagedly positions itself as an AI-powered talent management platform with modules spanning performance reviews, goal management, 360-degree feedback, learning and development, employee engagement, recognition, and career development. Its central AI layer is Marissa AI, an agentic assistant that operates across goals, feedback, learning, recognition, and career growth.

Engagedly’s G2 rating is 4.3/5 from approximately 538 reviews as of June 2026. Capterra rates it 4.6/5 from 77 reviews, with customer service at 4.7/5 and value for money at 4.6/5. The review base spans small and mid-market organizations, with information technology, financial services, healthcare, education management, and management consulting among the most represented industries.

The clearest differentiator is the built-in LMS. Engagedly’s Learn & Grow module includes course creation, learning path assignment, completion tracking, skill matrix and competency framework tools, and personalized development plans, all connected directly to performance goals and review data. Organizations that would otherwise pay for a separate LMS subscription can consolidate onto one platform.

Key features include:

• Performance reviews: customizable review cycles with multi-rater support, self-assessments, manager evaluations, 360-degree and project-based reviews, calibration sessions, and 9-box matrix
• Goals and OKRs: cascading from company to team to individual with AI-powered predictive insights and real-time progress tracking
• Built-in LMS (Learn & Grow): course creation, learning paths, completion tracking, skill matrix, competency frameworks, personalized development plans, LinkedIn Learning integration; $3/user/month
• Engagement surveys (Engage & Listen): pulse surveys, eNPS, and customizable surveys; $2/user/month
• Recognition and rewards (Recognize & Reward): gamified recognition with badges, points, leaderboards, and a public praise wall; $2/user/month
• Career development and talent mobility: AI-driven skill tracking, career pathing, succession planning, and internal mobility workflows
• Marissa AI: agentic AI across all modules for goal suggestions, feedback nudges, meeting summaries, learning recommendations, review writing assistance, and engagement analysis
• Integrations: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Namely, Okta, OneLogin, Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Outlook, Gmail, Google Sheets, Jira, LinkedIn Learning, and 30+ additional tools

To explore all modules and request a quote, visit Engagedly's official website.

Why Teams Choose Engagedly

“I love that your able to impersonate users to assist them through any questions or issues they may be experiencing when wanting to share a post on the social feed, set goals for performance reviews, or redeem rewards they've earned. Engagedly has allowed for innovative performance management tool that is user friendly.” – G2 reviewer

• Built-in LMS eliminates a separate tool budget. Course creation, learning paths, skill tracking, and personalized development plans are included in the Learn & Grow module at $3/user/month. Most performance management platforms do not include a native LMS, meaning organizations pay for two subscriptions. Engagedly consolidates them.
• Broader talent management scope at a competitive price. For $5/user/month (Manage Performance) plus module add-ons, Engagedly covers performance, learning, engagement, and recognition. The entry price for each module is $2 to $3/user/month. Organizations that need breadth without an enterprise budget find the value proposition compelling.
• Marissa AI operates across the full platform. Goal suggestions, feedback nudges, meeting summaries, learning recommendations, review writing assistance, and engagement analysis all run through the same AI layer. It is not a feature bolted onto one module; it operates as an agentic assistant across the entire workflow.
• Gamification drives adoption. Points, badges, leaderboards, and a public praise wall are built into the recognition module. G2 reviewers describe the gamification as a genuine adoption driver, particularly for distributed teams where engagement with HR tools is typically lower.

Where Engagedly Falls Short

“The new UI has made it hard to find some things that used to be easily accessible like creating job titles. I wish the new UI was a little more intuitive” – Capterra reviewer

• Navigation complexity at scale. G2 reviewers flag navigation difficulty for admins managing multiple modules, particularly when switching between admin and personal contexts. Initial setup and template design take more time than simpler platforms. The breadth that makes Engagedly compelling also makes it harder to configure quickly.
• Platform speed under load. Multiple reviewers mention slow loading times, particularly on the mobile app. For organizations where managers need fast access to review and goal data, this is a friction point that is consistent across the review base.
• Reporting has documented limitations. Reviewers flag that reporting capabilities can feel limited for complex data analysis, and that extracting customized data exports requires more effort than expected.
• Spell check is absent in key workflows. Reviewers specifically note the absence of spell check when creating goals and performance evaluations. For a platform used extensively for written assessments, this is a quality-of-life gap that recurs across reviews.
• Pricing requires a sales conversation for full-suite cost. While Engagedly publishes per-module starting prices, total cost depends on which modules are selected and headcount. The full talent management suite requires a vendor quote to budget accurately.

PerformYard vs Engagedly: Feature Comparison

The overlap between these platforms is real but surface-level. The architectural differences determine who each one is actually built for.

Performance Reviews and Calibration

PerformYard’s review cycle depth is the clearest differentiator on this dimension. Multiple concurrent review types with fully configurable question sets, rating scales, and reviewer logic give HR teams real control. The documentation trail and sign-off workflows are built for compliance. Completion rates are driven by automated reminders and the simplicity of the review interface itself.

Engagedly covers comparable review functionality: multi-rater reviews, self-assessments, manager evaluations, 360-degree and project-based cycles, calibration sessions, and a 9-box matrix. The review builder allows custom templates with competency frameworks, rating scales, and weighted sections. The breadth is comparable; the depth of cycle configuration and the compliance documentation trail is not.

Verdict: PerformYard for review cycle depth, completion-rate focus, and compliance documentation. Engagedly covers the review requirement adequately but it is not the primary reason to choose the platform.

Learning and Development

This dimension is not competitive. PerformYard has no native LMS. Learning management requires a separate tool and a separate budget. For organizations that need performance and development in the same system, PerformYard cannot deliver that without adding a third-party integration.

Engagedly’s Learn & Grow module is the platform’s strongest differentiator. Course creation, learning path assignment, completion tracking, skill matrix and competency framework tools, and personalized development plans are built in at $3/user/month. LinkedIn Learning integration extends the catalog. Development plans connect directly to performance goals and review data, so learning follows from performance conversations rather than sitting in a separate system.

Verdict: Engagedly, without qualification. If learning and development integration is a requirement, PerformYard cannot address it. If it is not, this dimension is irrelevant to the decision.

Goals and OKR Management

Both platforms connect goals to review cycles and provide cascading from organizational to individual level. Engagedly’s goal module includes AI-powered predictive insights and real-time progress tracking across a broader organizational hierarchy. G2 reviewers describe goal alignment as one of the platform’s consistent strengths.

PerformYard’s goal module is functional and well-integrated with reviews but lighter. It does not match the cascading alignment depth of dedicated OKR platforms, and PerformYard’s own research shows goal completion drops when managers oversee 20+ direct reports, suggesting the module is more effective for smaller team structures.

Verdict: Engagedly for goal and OKR depth at organizational scale. PerformYard covers the requirement for smaller teams where goals feed into reviews without needing cross-organizational alignment infrastructure.

AI Capabilities

PerformYard’s AI is review-focused: Review Assist coaches managers on writing quality and consistency during review completion, Review Summary condenses multi-form packets into actionable outputs, and Ask PerformYard handles policy and process questions conversationally. These are practical, targeted applications.

Engagedly’s Marissa AI operates as an agentic layer across all modules: goal suggestions, feedback nudges, meeting summaries, learning recommendations, review writing assistance, and engagement analysis. The scope is broader because the platform is broader. The AI follows the platform’s own breadth.

Verdict: Engagedly for AI breadth across a full talent management workflow. PerformYard for AI depth specifically in the review completion workflow. The right answer depends on which workflow the buyer is optimizing.

Engagement and Recognition

Engagedly’s engagement and recognition tools are native and substantial. Pulse surveys, eNPS, and customizable surveys in the Engage & Listen module ($2/user/month) connect directly to performance data. The Recognize & Reward module ($2/user/month) includes gamified recognition: badges, points, leaderboards, and a public praise wall. Gamification is a specific design choice that drives the adoption rates Engagedly’s reviewers describe.

PerformYard’s engagement surveys are an add-on ($2 to $4/person/month) with AI-driven recommendations. There is no native recognition or gamification capability. For organizations where engagement measurement and recognition are primary investments, PerformYard is a secondary tool.

Verdict: Engagedly. Native engagement surveys, recognition, and gamification are not add-ons; they are purpose-built modules. PerformYard’s engagement offering is more limited and more expensive on a per-unit basis.

Customer Support and Implementation

PerformYard’s support model is the clearest structural differentiator in this comparison. Every account gets a named customer success manager, hands-on implementation, unlimited employee trainings, and phone and video support, all included at no extra cost. Capterra’s customer service score of 4.7/5 for PerformYard is among the highest in the category.

Engagedly offers 24/7 live rep support, in-person training, live online sessions, webinars, documentation, and a knowledge base. Capterra’s customer service score of 4.7/5 reflects that support is responsive and well-regarded. The difference is in the model: PerformYard provides a named CSM for every account; Engagedly provides channel-based support that is strong but not as personalized.

Verdict: PerformYard for the dedicated success manager model. Engagedly’s support is strong; PerformYard’s is more hands-on by design.

Pricing and Transparency

Both platforms publish starting prices. Engagedly’s structure is modular by design: Engage & Listen and Recognize & Reward each start at $2/user/month (annual); Learn & Grow is $3/user/month; Manage Performance is $5/user/month. Organizations can buy only the modules they need, and confirmed pricing is from Capterra (June 2026).

PerformYard’s Performance Management module runs $5 to $10/person/month (annual, billed by headcount tier). PerformYard AI adds $1 to $3/person/month; Engagement surveys add $2 to $4/person/month; Meetings add $2 to $4/person/month. Support and implementation are included free at all tiers.

Verdict: Engagedly’s lower entry point ($2/user/month for standalone modules) gives it a starting-price advantage. PerformYard’s included support and implementation offset some of the per-seat cost for organizations that would otherwise pay for onboarding separately. Full-suite cost for both requires a vendor conversation.

Pricing Comparison

Both platforms publish starting prices per module. All figures below are confirmed from Capterra and vendor pricing pages (July 2026). Final cost at your headcount and module selection requires a vendor quote from each.

PerformYard:

• Performance Management: $5 to $10/person/month (annual, minimum pricing applies; enterprise discounts available). Includes review cycles, 360 feedback, goal tracking, continuous feedback, reporting, sign-off workflows.
• PerformYard AI: typically +$1 to $3/person/month (based on public listings and market guides; confirm with vendor). Review Assist, Review Summary, AI meeting notes, Ask PerformYard.
• Engagement Surveys: typically +$2 to $4/person/month (confirm with vendor).
• Meetings: typically +$2 to $4/person/month (confirm with vendor).
• Support and implementation: free for every customer. Includes dedicated success manager, hands-on implementation, unlimited trainings, phone and video support, HRIS integrations, SSO.

Engagedly:

• Engage & Listen (pulse surveys, eNPS): $2/user/month (annual).
• Recognize & Reward (gamified recognition, praise wall): $2/user/month (annual).
• Learn & Grow (LMS, skill matrix, development plans): $3/user/month (annual).
• Manage Performance (reviews, OKRs, 360 feedback, check-ins): $5/user/month (annual).
• Full talent management suite: contact vendor for bundled pricing.

Worked example at 200 employees: PerformYard Performance at $5/person runs $12,000/year before AI or engagement add-ons; at $10/person it runs $24,000/year. Engagedly Manage Performance alone at $5/user runs $12,000/year; adding Learn & Grow ($3) and Engage & Listen ($2) brings the total to $24,000/year for three modules. At comparable feature scope, the costs are similar. PerformYard’s advantage is included support; Engagedly’s is the LMS already in that budget.

Which Tool Is Right For You?

Choose PerformYard If:

• Review completion rates are the primary problem. PerformYard’s automated reminders, simple interface, and configurable cycles are designed specifically to make review cycles complete on time, and the data supports this.
• Your organization operates in a regulated industry with compliance and audit requirements. Financial services, healthcare, legal, and federal contractors benefit from PerformYard’s searchable, exportable documentation trail.
• HR does not have deep technical resources and needs hands-on support. The dedicated success manager model is structural, not an upsell, and covers implementation, training, and ongoing configuration.
• You need multiple concurrent review types. Project-based reviews, exit reviews, 30/60/90-day check-ins, and annual cycles running simultaneously with separate configurations are available out of the box.
• Learning and development is handled by a separate tool or is not a current priority. If that changes, evaluate 15Five or Engagedly for integrated LMS options.

Choose Engagedly If:

• Performance reviews and learning management need to live in the same system. The built-in LMS at $3/user/month eliminates a separate tool budget and connects development directly to performance data.
• Gamification and recognition are part of the engagement strategy. Points, badges, leaderboards, and a public praise wall drive adoption among distributed teams in a way that PerformYard does not support natively.
• You need broader talent management scope: performance, learning, engagement, recognition, career development, and succession planning in one platform without coordinating across multiple vendors.
• Your organization needs AI across the full talent management workflow, not just the review completion step. Marissa AI operates across goals, feedback, learning, recognition, and career growth.
• Entry-cost flexibility matters. Standalone modules at $2 to $3/user/month let smaller organizations test one capability before committing to the full suite.

Final Verdict

If performance reviews are the problem, PerformYard is the more purpose-built answer. The configuration depth, the compliance documentation, the completion-rate focus, and the dedicated support model all serve that specific goal. The 4.7/5 G2 rating from 1,260 reviews is sustained evidence that it works for the organizations it targets.

If talent management breadth is the problem, Engagedly is the more appropriate platform. Performance reviews, OKRs, a built-in LMS, engagement surveys, recognition, and career development in one system at competitive per-module pricing is the value proposition that organizations consolidating tools consistently describe as the reason they chose it over narrower alternatives.

The honest tiebreaker is the LMS. If your organization currently pays for a separate learning management system and wants to consolidate, Engagedly's built-in LMS at $3/user/month is a concrete financial argument that PerformYard cannot match. If the LMS is not in scope, PerformYard's review depth and support model are harder to beat at this price point. For buyers who have ruled out both, the top performance management software roundup covers the broader field.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between PerformYard and Engagedly?

PerformYard is a focused performance review platform: configurable cycles, compliance documentation, dedicated support, and high completion rates. Engagedly is a broader talent management suite: performance reviews plus a built-in LMS, engagement surveys, gamified recognition, and AI-driven career development in one system. The choice is between review depth and talent management breadth.

Which is more affordable, PerformYard or Engagedly?

Both platforms start at $5/user/month for their core performance management tier. Engagedly’s modular entry points ($2/user/month for standalone engagement or recognition modules) give it more flexibility at the low end. PerformYard’s included support and implementation offset some per-seat cost for organizations that would otherwise pay separately for onboarding. Full-suite cost for both requires a vendor quote.

Does PerformYard have a built-in LMS?

No, PerformYard has no native learning management capability. Training, course creation, and skill tracking require a separate tool. This is the clearest structural gap relative to Engagedly, which includes a full LMS in its Learn & Grow module at $3/user/month.

Which platform is better for regulated industries?

PerformYard is the more specific fit. Its searchable, exportable documentation trail, sign-off workflows, and audit-ready review history consistently appear in reviews from financial services, healthcare, and federal contractor organizations with OFCCP compliance needs. Engagedly covers documentation adequately but does not market or configure for compliance use cases at the same specificity.

Which has better user ratings?

PerformYard leads on both platforms: 4.7/5 on G2 (approx. 1,260 reviews) and 4.7/5 on Capterra (approx. 187 reviews) versus Engagedly’s 4.3/5 on G2 (538 reviews) and 4.6/5 on Capterra (77 reviews). Both verified July 2026. PerformYard’s higher volume and higher score on G2 gives buyers more signal for evaluation.